One page, not a deck
You have spent the last five modules building the components of your firm's AI readiness assessment. A scorecard. A prioritised workflow list. Tool category matches. ROI calculations. Now you assemble them into a single deliverable: the AI Readiness Report.
This is one page. Not a 30-slide deck. Not a 20-page whitepaper. One page that a managing director can read in three minutes and say "yes, let's do this" or "what questions do I have?"
Why one page? Because the person who decides your AI budget has 47 other things competing for their attention. A deck gets shelved. A one-pager gets read, forwarded, and discussed.
Why is a one-page format more effective than a detailed deck for an AI readiness report?
The five-section structure
Your readiness report has five sections. Each one maps directly to work you have already done in this course.
Section 1: Current State — Your readiness scorecard results from Module 2. Where does your firm stand across the five dimensions? What is the overall readiness level?
Section 2: Priority Opportunities — Your top 3 VALUE-scored workflows from Module 4. What are the highest-impact places to apply AI?
Section 3: Recommended Tools — Your category matches from Module 5. For each priority workflow, which category of AI tool is needed?
Section 4: Investment & ROI — Your calculations from Module 6. What does it cost, what does it return, and what is the payback period?
Section 5: Recommended Next Step — One specific action. Not "explore AI" — something like "Run a 6-week pilot with the credit analysis team on DD memo generation."
That is the entire document. Five sections, each 2-4 sentences. Let's fill them in.
Section 1 — Current State
Pull your scorecard from Module 2. Summarise it in two to three sentences.
Template:
Our firm currently scores [X/25] on AI readiness, placing us at the [Early/Developing/Established] stage. Our strongest dimension is [dimension] ([score]/5). Our most significant gaps are in [dimension] ([score]/5) and [dimension] ([score]/5).
Example:
Our firm scores 12/25 on AI readiness, placing us at the Developing stage. Our strongest dimension is Leadership Buy-In (4/5) — senior partners are vocal about AI's potential. Our most significant gaps are in Data Infrastructure (2/5) and Governance (1/5) — we lack a formal AI use policy and our key data sits in disconnected systems.
Notice what this does: it tells leadership "we are not starting from zero" (strengths) and "here is what is holding us back" (gaps). It creates urgency without panic.
Section 2 — Priority Opportunities
List your top three workflows from the VALUE scoring in Module 4. For each, state the workflow, the VALUE score, and the estimated time savings.
Template:
Priority opportunities (ranked by VALUE score):
- [Workflow] — VALUE score: [X/25]. Currently takes [Y hours/instance]. Est. [Z%] time savings.
- [Workflow] — VALUE score: [X/25]. Currently takes [Y hours/instance]. Est. [Z%] time savings.
- [Workflow] — VALUE score: [X/25]. Currently takes [Y hours/instance]. Est. [Z%] time savings.
Example:
Priority opportunities:
- Due diligence memo (first draft) — VALUE: 22/25. Currently 8 hours/memo, ~3 memos/week. Est. 60% time savings.
- Quarterly LP report compilation — VALUE: 19/25. Currently 12 hours/quarter per fund. Est. 50% time savings.
- Earnings transcript analysis — VALUE: 18/25. Currently 3 hours/transcript. Est. 70% time savings.
Keep it tight. The detail lives in your MODULE 4 working notes, not in the report itself.
Section 3 — Recommended Tools
Map each priority workflow to a tool category from Module 5 and indicate your firm's current state.
Template:
Tool requirements:
- [Workflow 1]: [Category] — [Current state: in place / partial / gap]
- [Workflow 2]: [Category] — [Current state]
- [Workflow 3]: [Category] — [Current state]
- Cross-cutting: Team Infrastructure (prompt library, shared workflows) — [Current state]
Approach: Buy platform infrastructure; build firm-specific configuration.
Example:
Tool requirements:
- DD memo generation: Category 2 (AI-Powered Work) — Gap. No current tooling.
- LP report compilation: Category 3 (Enterprise Integration) — Gap. Requires connection to portfolio management system.
- Earnings analysis: Category 1 (AI Assistant) — Partial. Some analysts using personal accounts; need enterprise deployment.
- Cross-cutting: Team Infrastructure — Gap. No shared prompt library or standardised workflows.
Approach: Buy enterprise AI platform with MCP capability; build DD and LP report workflows internally.
Section 4 — Investment & ROI
Pull your numbers from Module 6. Present both cost and value clearly.
Template:
Investment (Year 1): $[X] (licences: $[Y], implementation: $[Z], training: $[W]) Investment (Ongoing): $[X]/year
Projected annual value (conservative): $[X] Projected annual value (optimistic): $[X]
Payback period: [X] months Sanity check: 20% time savings on one senior associate ($[X]) exceeds total licence cost for [Y] users.
Example:
Investment (Year 1): $52,000 (licences: $14,400, implementation: $25,000, training: $12,600) Investment (Ongoing): $22,000/year
Projected annual value (conservative): $96,000 (DD workflow only) Projected annual value (optimistic): $185,000 (all three priority workflows)
Payback period: 7 months (conservative) / 4 months (optimistic) Sanity check: 20% time savings on one senior associate ($60K) exceeds the total annual licence cost for 30 users ($14,400).
The sanity check is there for the sceptic in the room. It reframes the investment in terms that are impossible to argue against.
What should you do if your ROI calculation relies heavily on estimated numbers rather than measured baselines?
Section 5 — Recommended Next Step
This is the most important section. It is one sentence that tells leadership exactly what to do.
Not "explore AI opportunities." Not "form a committee." One specific, time-bound action.
Strong examples:
- "Run a 6-week pilot: deploy Claude Enterprise to the credit analysis team for DD memo generation. Measure time savings vs current baseline. Budget: $8,000."
- "Procure 10 enterprise AI licences for the deal team and conduct a 2-week baselining exercise on our top 3 workflows. Budget: $3,200."
- "Appoint an AI champion in each deal team and establish a shared prompt library within 30 days. Budget: $0 (using existing tools)."
Weak examples:
- "Investigate AI solutions for the firm." (Too vague — what does "investigate" mean?)
- "Transform our operations with AI." (Too ambitious — no one knows what to do Monday morning.)
- "Continue monitoring the AI landscape." (This is code for "do nothing.")
The recommended next step should be something that can start within two weeks, has a clear budget, has a measurable outcome, and is low enough risk that leadership can say yes on the spot.
Presenting the report — five minutes, not thirty
You have one page. Present it in five minutes. Here is the structure:
Minute 1: Current State. "We scored X out of 25. Our strengths are [X]. Our gaps are [X]. We are at the [stage] — here is what that means relative to peer firms."
Minute 2: Opportunities. "We identified three high-value workflows. The biggest is [X], which costs us [Y] hours per week. AI can reduce that by [Z]%."
Minute 3: What we need. "For our top workflow, we need [tool category]. Our recommended approach is buy the platform, build the configuration."
Minute 4: ROI. "Conservative estimate: $[X] annual value against $[Y] cost. Payback in [Z] months. Sanity check: 20% of one associate's time pays for the entire team's licences."
Minute 5: The ask. "I recommend we [specific action] over the next [timeframe]. Budget is $[X]. We will measure [specific metric] and report back in [timeframe]."
Then stop talking. The five-minute constraint signals respect for their time. The one-page document stays with them after you leave. And the supporting detail from your earlier modules is ready if they ask.
How confident are you in presenting this readiness report to your leadership?
Your readiness report is done
You now have a one-page AI Readiness Report with five sections:
- Current State (from Module 2)
- Priority Opportunities (from Module 4)
- Recommended Tools (from Module 5)
- Investment & ROI (from Module 6)
- Recommended Next Step
In Module 8, you will turn this report into a 30/60/90 day action plan — the operational detail behind Section 5.
Module 7 — Knowledge Check
Why should the readiness report be one page instead of a detailed deck?
What makes a 'Recommended Next Step' effective?
How long should you spend presenting the readiness report to leadership?